By Jonathan de Oleo Ramos
Introduction: From Negation to the Enunciative Cry
The Dominican Republic is erected upon a deafening silence. Despite being a nation forged in the Caribbean experience, with an undeniable African heritage, its official historical narrative has been marked by decades of denial and ideological whitewashing. Thus, this text addresses the urgent need to confront the unofficial Black history—the accounts that the state deliberately omits, disguises, or stigmatizes, thereby violating the cultural rights of the Afro-descendant population.
This is not a simple matter of forgetting, but a conscious, officialized act of amnesia that seeks to maintain a racial and cultural hierarchy.1 This denial is an ideological defense mechanism that projects Blackness onto a feared “other”: the Haitian.
The work converges at the crossroads of the geographical and imagined Caribbean and implies exploring the power of enunciating Black existence from the perspective and desires of Black people themselves. As Frantz Fanon points out, decolonization is a violent process that must dismantle the psychological and cultural structures imposed by the colonizer.2 Cultural violence translates into persistent anti-Haitianism—the self-denial mechanism of Dominican Blackness.
In my research, I have argued that Dominican national history has been built upon a painful paradox: the denial of the other as a strategy for denying oneself. Within this analysis, I have conceptualized the figure of the “imaginary Haitian,” an ideological construct that displaces Blackness onto the other in an attempt to preserve a whitewashed and artificial official identity.3 This architecture of forgetting not only seeks to stigmatize our neighbors but also sever the African roots of our Dominican identity. Contemplating this reality, I find profound kindredness in the poetry of Pedro Mir: when he describes a country cloaked in invisibility and pain, he denounces, through his lines, that same foundational trauma that I continue to trace today, that of a nation that silences its true history to inhabit a shadow self.4
In the following text, I intend to question the hegemonic view upon which the perception of the Caribbean has been built—a space where, as Fernando Ortiz affirms when speaking of Cuban transculturation, African roots are inevitable.5 The aim is to transcend the Caribbean cliché and explore the deep decolonial sentiment that pulsates in daily practices, rituals, and ancestral knowledge.
The five thematic axes that will guide this exploration are: (1) Afro-descendant cultural history, (2) food and cooking, (3) the contributions of Black women, (4) rituals and ancestral knowledge, and (5) the denied living heritage.
The Enunciation of Decolonial Blackness
From my perspective, the enunciation of decolonial Blackness is not simply an exercise in ethnic self-recognition, but also a political and existential tool for the shattering of historical silence. With this tool, Afro-descendants reclaim their right to name reality as they see it, displacing the colonial gaze that has defined them for centuries. As I argue in my research, in the Dominican context this enunciation is an act of insurgency against the “imaginary Haitian,” since by saying “I am Black,” one dismantles the fiction of the state-led whitewashing that attempts to conceal African embodiments within racial euphemisms.
In practice, this tool operates through the politicization of the quotidian and the revaluation of what the powers that be have labeled “marginal.” For example, when a community defends drumming—not as a folkloric spectacle, but as a representation of life and an apparatus of spiritual communication—it is practicing decolonial enunciation. This tool also operates in aesthetics and the body; the rejection of Eurocentric beauty standards is a manifestation of what Fanon describes as the process of stripping away the “white masks” imposed by the colonizer.6 It is a faculty that transforms the chaos-world of the Caribbean into a sovereign space where ancestral memory is indispensable to the reconstruction of selfhood.
Decolonial scholars argue that this type of enunciation is fundamental to what is known as epistemic disobedience. Authors such as Walter Mignolo suggest that knowledge is not universal, but rather situated; therefore, enunciating from a Black perspective allows us to question who holds the power to produce historical “truths.”7
Similarly, Rita Segato argues that this reaffirmation is vital to counteracting the “colonial cruelty” that strips people of their sensitivity and roots.8 Ultimately, decolonial enunciation is the axis that allows the Afro-Dominican population to go from a silenced object of study to the architect of its own historical and cultural reparations.
This text delves into five interconnected themes that, together, map Black persistence upon the Dominican social fabric and challenge the official narrative.
Afro-Descendant Cultural History: Reclaiming Buried Memories
Food and Cooking: Memory Stored in Pots and Pans
The Contributions of Black Women: Custodians of Knowledge and Healing Practices
Rituals and Ancestral Knowledge: The Power of the Black Cosmos
Denied Living Heritage: The Case of Blackness
This comparative analysis reveals the profound epistemic and structural gap that exists between the hegemonic cultural narrative and the lived experiences of the Afro-descendant population in the Dominican Republic. While the official narrative (state denial)—shaped by Segato’s ideas of the mandates of whiteness24—reduces history to folklore, gastronomy to “rustic food,” and ritual to “superstition,” decolonial enunciation affirms the rich complexity of these elements.
In this popular view, Black culture is a complex cosmological system, Black women are custodians of memory, and living heritage is an inalienable right. Given this duality, I argue that state denial not only renders ancestral knowledge invisible but also criminalizes and devalues it. From my perspective, this pressure forces Black practices to operate within a space of constant resistance, representing what Fanon defines as the struggle for the cultural rehumanization of the colonized.25
Conclusion: A Call for Reparations and Valorization
The persistence of unofficial Black history in the Dominican Republic is an act of cultural sovereignty and irrefutable proof of the tenacity of the African diaspora. The state’s denial of this living heritage is not unintentional, but rather the continuation of an ideological project of symbolic dispossession that has shaped national identity since the country’s independence.
Through this analysis, I have demonstrated that the enunciation of Black existence by the community itself is an essential decolonial force. I believe that Black knowledge and rituals constitute the living archives that Fanon urged the colonized to reclaim in order to forge a new, free consciousness.26
By naming and valorizing the resistance’s chaos-world, I seek to dismantle the fiction of homogeneity and Hispanicity that has marked our historical discourse.
Therefore, I call for necessary historical and symbolic reparations. I maintain that the Dominican Republic must dismantle anti-Haitianism as a mechanism of cultural and racial self-denial, a phenomenon that, as Segato reminds us, hinders social healing.27
From my perspective, the recognition of Blackness is an ethical imperative and an essential step toward achieving true cultural sovereignty, enabling the nation to stop persecuting and criminalizing its own roots.
Regional Examples of Recognition and Appreciation
The Dominican Republic can look to clear regional examples of those who have embraced and valued their Black history and are working toward a more inclusive and just present, such as:
The Dominican Republic has the opportunity to embrace its complexity and understand that Black existence is not a threat to Dominican identity, but instead, its deepest and most resilient foundation. Embracing this history and honoring the women who safeguarded it and the knowledge that sustained it is the only path to cultural decolonization and the true consolidation of a state that fully respects the rights of all its citizens. Blackness, expressed from the perspective of its people, is the key to leaving behind the chaos-world and building a genuinely pluralistic nation.
1 Rita Segato, Contra-pedagogías de la crueldad (Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros, 2018), 25.
2 Frantz Fanon, Los condenados de la tierra, trans. Julieta Campos (Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1961), 31.
3 Jonathan De Oleo Ramos, “El haitiano imaginario en el colectivo dominicano y el antihaitianismo desbordado,” Acento, November 10, 2024, https://acento.com.do/cultura/el-haitiano-imaginario-en-el-colectivo-dominicano-y-el-antihaitianismo-desbordado-9419787.html.
4 Pedro Mir, Hay un país en el mundo (Santo Domingo: Editora Taller, 1949), 11-15.
5 Fernando Ortiz, Contrapunteo cubano del tabaco y el azúcar (Havana: Jesús Montero, 1940), 98-102.
6 Frantz Fanon, Piel negra, máscaras blancas (Buenos Aires: Abraxas, 1952), 45-50.
7 Walter Mignolo, Desobediencia epistémica: Retórica de la modernidad, lógica de la colonialidad y gramática de la descolonialidad (Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo, 2010), 12-15.
8 Segato, op. cit., 26.
9 Franklin Franco Pichardo, Historia de las ideas políticas en la República Dominicana (Santo Domingo: Editora Nacional, 1975), 112-115.
10 Fanon, Los condenados, 33.
11 Martha Ellen Davis, La otra historia: Estudios de entomusicología dominicana (Santo Domingo: Editora de UASD, 1987), 89-94.
12 Édouard Glissant, Poética de la relación, trans. Linda María G. (Mexico City: Siglo XXI, 2017), 42-45.
13 Manuel Zapata Olivella, Changó, el gran putas (Bogotá: Editorial Oveja Negra, 1983), 210-215.
14 Jonathan De Oleo Ramos, Antropología del plátano (Santo Domingo: Platón Ediciones, 2024), 22.
15 Segato, op. cit., 27.
16 Editor’s note: Information provided on the basis of an unpublished ethnography conducted by the author.
17 Jonathan del Oleo Ramos, Cofradías dominicanas del espíritu santo, self-published, 2023.
18 Fanon, Los condenados.
19 Leslie G. Desmangles, The Faces of the Gods: Vodou and Roman Catholicism in Haiti (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992), 62-65.
20 Segato, op. cit., 35.
21 Jonathan De Oleo Ramos, “El haitiano imaginario en el colectivo dominicano y el antihaitianismo desbordado,” Acento, November 10, 2024,https://acento.com.do/cultura/el-haitiano-imaginario-en-el-colectivo-dominicano-y-el-antihaitianismo-desbordado-9419787.html.
22 Franklin Franco Pichardo, Los negros, los mulatos y la nación dominicana, (Edición Independiente), 114.
23 Author’s contribution.
24 Segato, op. cit,.
25 Fanon, Op.Cit., 34.
26 Fanon, Los condenados de la tierra., 35.
27 Segato, Op.Cit., 27.
Introduction: From Negation to the Enunciative Cry
The Dominican Republic is erected upon a deafening silence. Despite being a nation forged in the Caribbean experience, with an undeniable African heritage, its official historical narrative has been marked by decades of denial and ideological whitewashing. Thus, this text addresses the urgent need to confront the unofficial Black history—the accounts that the state deliberately omits, disguises, or stigmatizes, thereby violating the cultural rights of the Afro-descendant population.
This is not a simple matter of forgetting, but a conscious, officialized act of amnesia that seeks to maintain a racial and cultural hierarchy.1 This denial is an ideological defense mechanism that projects Blackness onto a feared “other”: the Haitian.
The work converges at the crossroads of the geographical and imagined Caribbean and implies exploring the power of enunciating Black existence from the perspective and desires of Black people themselves. As Frantz Fanon points out, decolonization is a violent process that must dismantle the psychological and cultural structures imposed by the colonizer.2 Cultural violence translates into persistent anti-Haitianism—the self-denial mechanism of Dominican Blackness.
In my research, I have argued that Dominican national history has been built upon a painful paradox: the denial of the other as a strategy for denying oneself. Within this analysis, I have conceptualized the figure of the “imaginary Haitian,” an ideological construct that displaces Blackness onto the other in an attempt to preserve a whitewashed and artificial official identity.3 This architecture of forgetting not only seeks to stigmatize our neighbors but also sever the African roots of our Dominican identity. Contemplating this reality, I find profound kindredness in the poetry of Pedro Mir: when he describes a country cloaked in invisibility and pain, he denounces, through his lines, that same foundational trauma that I continue to trace today, that of a nation that silences its true history to inhabit a shadow self.4
In the following text, I intend to question the hegemonic view upon which the perception of the Caribbean has been built—a space where, as Fernando Ortiz affirms when speaking of Cuban transculturation, African roots are inevitable.5 The aim is to transcend the Caribbean cliché and explore the deep decolonial sentiment that pulsates in daily practices, rituals, and ancestral knowledge.
The five thematic axes that will guide this exploration are: (1) Afro-descendant cultural history, (2) food and cooking, (3) the contributions of Black women, (4) rituals and ancestral knowledge, and (5) the denied living heritage.
The Enunciation of Decolonial Blackness
From my perspective, the enunciation of decolonial Blackness is not simply an exercise in ethnic self-recognition, but also a political and existential tool for the shattering of historical silence. With this tool, Afro-descendants reclaim their right to name reality as they see it, displacing the colonial gaze that has defined them for centuries. As I argue in my research, in the Dominican context this enunciation is an act of insurgency against the “imaginary Haitian,” since by saying “I am Black,” one dismantles the fiction of the state-led whitewashing that attempts to conceal African embodiments within racial euphemisms.
In practice, this tool operates through the politicization of the quotidian and the revaluation of what the powers that be have labeled “marginal.” For example, when a community defends drumming—not as a folkloric spectacle, but as a representation of life and an apparatus of spiritual communication—it is practicing decolonial enunciation. This tool also operates in aesthetics and the body; the rejection of Eurocentric beauty standards is a manifestation of what Fanon describes as the process of stripping away the “white masks” imposed by the colonizer.6 It is a faculty that transforms the chaos-world of the Caribbean into a sovereign space where ancestral memory is indispensable to the reconstruction of selfhood.
Decolonial scholars argue that this type of enunciation is fundamental to what is known as epistemic disobedience. Authors such as Walter Mignolo suggest that knowledge is not universal, but rather situated; therefore, enunciating from a Black perspective allows us to question who holds the power to produce historical “truths.”7
Similarly, Rita Segato argues that this reaffirmation is vital to counteracting the “colonial cruelty” that strips people of their sensitivity and roots.8 Ultimately, decolonial enunciation is the axis that allows the Afro-Dominican population to go from a silenced object of study to the architect of its own historical and cultural reparations.
This text delves into five interconnected themes that, together, map Black persistence upon the Dominican social fabric and challenge the official narrative.
Afro-Descendant Cultural History: Reclaiming Buried Memories
Food and Cooking: Memory Stored in Pots and Pans
The Contributions of Black Women: Custodians of Knowledge and Healing Practices
Rituals and Ancestral Knowledge: The Power of the Black Cosmos
Denied Living Heritage: The Case of Blackness
This comparative analysis reveals the profound epistemic and structural gap that exists between the hegemonic cultural narrative and the lived experiences of the Afro-descendant population in the Dominican Republic. While the official narrative (state denial)—shaped by Segato’s ideas of the mandates of whiteness24—reduces history to folklore, gastronomy to “rustic food,” and ritual to “superstition,” decolonial enunciation affirms the rich complexity of these elements.
In this popular view, Black culture is a complex cosmological system, Black women are custodians of memory, and living heritage is an inalienable right. Given this duality, I argue that state denial not only renders ancestral knowledge invisible but also criminalizes and devalues it. From my perspective, this pressure forces Black practices to operate within a space of constant resistance, representing what Fanon defines as the struggle for the cultural rehumanization of the colonized.25
Conclusion: A Call for Reparations and Valorization
The persistence of unofficial Black history in the Dominican Republic is an act of cultural sovereignty and irrefutable proof of the tenacity of the African diaspora. The state’s denial of this living heritage is not unintentional, but rather the continuation of an ideological project of symbolic dispossession that has shaped national identity since the country’s independence.
Through this analysis, I have demonstrated that the enunciation of Black existence by the community itself is an essential decolonial force. I believe that Black knowledge and rituals constitute the living archives that Fanon urged the colonized to reclaim in order to forge a new, free consciousness.26
By naming and valorizing the resistance’s chaos-world, I seek to dismantle the fiction of homogeneity and Hispanicity that has marked our historical discourse.
Therefore, I call for necessary historical and symbolic reparations. I maintain that the Dominican Republic must dismantle anti-Haitianism as a mechanism of cultural and racial self-denial, a phenomenon that, as Segato reminds us, hinders social healing.27
From my perspective, the recognition of Blackness is an ethical imperative and an essential step toward achieving true cultural sovereignty, enabling the nation to stop persecuting and criminalizing its own roots.
Regional Examples of Recognition and Appreciation
The Dominican Republic can look to clear regional examples of those who have embraced and valued their Black history and are working toward a more inclusive and just present, such as:
The Dominican Republic has the opportunity to embrace its complexity and understand that Black existence is not a threat to Dominican identity, but instead, its deepest and most resilient foundation. Embracing this history and honoring the women who safeguarded it and the knowledge that sustained it is the only path to cultural decolonization and the true consolidation of a state that fully respects the rights of all its citizens. Blackness, expressed from the perspective of its people, is the key to leaving behind the chaos-world and building a genuinely pluralistic nation.
1 Rita Segato, Contra-pedagogías de la crueldad (Buenos Aires: Prometeo Libros, 2018), 25.
2 Frantz Fanon, Los condenados de la tierra, trans. Julieta Campos (Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1961), 31.
3 Jonathan De Oleo Ramos, “El haitiano imaginario en el colectivo dominicano y el antihaitianismo desbordado,” Acento, November 10, 2024, https://acento.com.do/cultura/el-haitiano-imaginario-en-el-colectivo-dominicano-y-el-antihaitianismo-desbordado-9419787.html.
4 Pedro Mir, Hay un país en el mundo (Santo Domingo: Editora Taller, 1949), 11-15.
5 Fernando Ortiz, Contrapunteo cubano del tabaco y el azúcar (Havana: Jesús Montero, 1940), 98-102.
6 Frantz Fanon, Piel negra, máscaras blancas (Buenos Aires: Abraxas, 1952), 45-50.
7 Walter Mignolo, Desobediencia epistémica: Retórica de la modernidad, lógica de la colonialidad y gramática de la descolonialidad (Buenos Aires: Ediciones del Signo, 2010), 12-15.
8 Segato, op. cit., 26.
9 Franklin Franco Pichardo, Historia de las ideas políticas en la República Dominicana (Santo Domingo: Editora Nacional, 1975), 112-115.
10 Fanon, Los condenados, 33.
11 Martha Ellen Davis, La otra historia: Estudios de entomusicología dominicana (Santo Domingo: Editora de UASD, 1987), 89-94.
12 Édouard Glissant, Poética de la relación, trans. Linda María G. (Mexico City: Siglo XXI, 2017), 42-45.
13 Manuel Zapata Olivella, Changó, el gran putas (Bogotá: Editorial Oveja Negra, 1983), 210-215.
14 Jonathan De Oleo Ramos, Antropología del plátano (Santo Domingo: Platón Ediciones, 2024), 22.
15 Segato, op. cit., 27.
16 Editor’s note: Information provided on the basis of an unpublished ethnography conducted by the author.
17 Jonathan del Oleo Ramos, Cofradías dominicanas del espíritu santo, self-published, 2023.
18 Fanon, Los condenados.
19 Leslie G. Desmangles, The Faces of the Gods: Vodou and Roman Catholicism in Haiti (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992), 62-65.
20 Segato, op. cit., 35.
21 Jonathan De Oleo Ramos, “El haitiano imaginario en el colectivo dominicano y el antihaitianismo desbordado,” Acento, November 10, 2024,https://acento.com.do/cultura/el-haitiano-imaginario-en-el-colectivo-dominicano-y-el-antihaitianismo-desbordado-9419787.html.
22 Franklin Franco Pichardo, Los negros, los mulatos y la nación dominicana, (Edición Independiente), 114.
23 Author’s contribution.
24 Segato, op. cit,.
25 Fanon, Op.Cit., 34.
26 Fanon, Los condenados de la tierra., 35.
27 Segato, Op.Cit., 27.